Critique the paper 'Are the women in Management victims of the male Essay

Critique the paper 'Are the women in Management victims of the male norm' (Billing, 2011) - Essay Example Before the critical review, a summary of the article will be drawn, based on the main points and conclusion of the article. The effectiveness of the structure of article will be analysed in the next stage. These sections will also investigation about the setting of information and the ease of availability. After that, the essay will critically examine the article, giving thrust to its major points and its relevance in the current environment. The critique will also include article’s authority, objectivity, accuracy, currency and coverage (Centre for Academic Excellence, 2008). Accessibility as well as credibility of the article will be judged on the basis of the various criteria discussed above. Overall the article was clear, well written and relevant. Article summary The purpose of the article is to explore work practise norms and gender issues that influence and affect women in workplace. The article has given special attention to women working in managerial position. Accord ing to the author, most of the managerial positions in workplace are expected to be filled by men. As a result, women find it difficult while holding or accepting a position. In order to further this investigation, the author has used a primary research method, doing a survey with 20 women in managerial positions. ... Article structure In order to provide a thesis or stance to the developed article, it was introduced with a short abstract. This abstract provided a brief overview of the critical points in the article. The rationale was included for the article as well as the research. The article contained short paragraphs and access to information was easy. However, only 3 headings were provided for the main body thus segregating a lot of information in each heading. Most of the information provided in the article was conventional. For example, a proper review of the literature and post works was done before doing the survey. And the results were analysed using the similarity between what has been said and what was found through the survey (Armstrong, Henson and Savage, 2009). However, the conclusion formed at the end of the article was too short to come to a final decisive argument. There was no comprehensive summary of the crucial points in order to review the findings. At the end, links to jour nals, subjects, references, authors were provided to allow better evaluation of the author’s work (Craswell, 2005). However, providing links at each heading world have made the evaluation process much faster and easier. Article critique In the article the main argument which the author has put is the relevance of using male as the general norm which explains the difficulties of women in management. According to the author, the idea that women do not belong to the managerial place and they are basically ‘others’ in this managerial place is based on few rigid ideas pertaining to male norms (Acker, 2006). But given the fact that these norms have generated from ideas which are ages old, the credibility of these male norms are in question. The sections of